Inventory
info icon
Single family homes on the market. Updated weekly.Powered by Altos Research
682,150-7,865
30-yr Fixed Rate30-yr Fixed
info icon
30-Yr. Fixed Conforming. Updated hourly during market hours.
6.91%0.02
BrokerageReal Estate

RE/MAX takes a hard line on Clear Cooperation

RE/MAX believes that removing the policy would ’benefit a few at the expense of many’

While the debate over the controversial Clear Cooperation Policy (CCP) rages on, another big brokerage has weighed in.

On the firm’s third-quarter 2024 earnings call on Friday, RE/MAX CEO Erik Carlson said that the brokerage supports CCP because it “believes in prioritizing consumer interest over practices that benefit a few at the expense of many.” 

“Agents and companies who promote listings to the widest possible audience are serving the best interests of buyers and sellers alike and honoring their fiduciary responsibilities,” Carlson said. “Buyers deserve equal access to available properties, and sellers deserve the broadest possible exposure for their homes. We stand for trust, transparency and professionalism.”

Carlson’s comment that ending the policy will “benefit a few at the expense of many” could be taken as a veiled shot at brokerages like Compass and The Agency, whose growth plans include making their platforms a hub for exclusive listings.

CCP is a rule imposed by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) that requires Realtors to list their properties on a NAR-affiliated multiple listing service (MLS) within a day of signing a listing agreement. It serves as a significant barrier to building an exclusive listings inventory.

Compass has been more than vocal in its opposition to CCP. On its Q3 2024 earnings call on Wednesday, Compass CEO Robert Reffkin framed the brokerage’s position as support for “seller’s choice,” stating that “homeowners should not be forced to do anything they don’t want to do.”

CCP is being reviewed by NAR as the Department of Justice (DOJ) under President Joe Biden’s watch has taken aim at real estate practices it deems anti-competitive.

Thus far, NAR has declined to make a firm decision on whether to keep CCP or dump it. NAR’s advisory board held a meeting last week on the topic that ended with no action as the trade group stated that further review was necessary.

But NAR’s reluctance to make any changes may simply be a stalling tactic. The presidential election will result in a change of administration regardless of whether Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump wins. But a second Trump administration would likely shift priorities for the DOJ and allow NAR to keep the policy without the threat of DOJ intervention.

Positions on CCP from entities in real estate are largely dictated by self-interest. Listings are the life blood of MLSs, which have come out in favor of the policy. Last week, Denee Evans, CEO of the Council of Multiple Listing Services, sent an email to its members and NAR stating that concerns about the policy are “inherently invalid.”

Meanwhile, The Agency founder Mauricio Umansky has made no secret of his opposition to CCP, telling HousingWire in October that the policy is “anti-competitive and anti-freedom of choice, which is what our entire country is built on.” The Agency is also pursuing exclusive listings.

RE/MAX’s earnings call disclosed mixed results for the company. While it posted a profit of just shy of $1 million on $78.48 million in revenue, its agent count continues to stagnate. The company disclosed that it had 52,808 agents in the U.S. at the end of the third quarter, a 6.5% year-over-year decline.

After the earnings call, shares of RE/MAX fell sharply.

Comments

  1. If Compass and The Agency want to drop off of the MLS and go it alone, it would be such a dis-service to their sellers and it would be a death sentence to Compass and The Agency. A big THANK YOU to RE/MAX CEO Erik Carlson for his logical thinking. After being out of real estate sales for a decade, I was surprised by the “cottage industry” that has developed selling services to agents and to destroy the MLS would put thousands of people selling support to REALTORS® out of business, not counting REALTORS® themselves. It’s time Congress passes legislation to PROTECT the REALTOR® MLS from the onslaught of lawsuits. Why? Before agency, the REALTOR® Code of Ethics protected EVERYONE in the sale and our job, as real estate sales people was to bring buyers and sellers together and treat EVERYONE honestly and fairly. That principle is still operative today, even though lawyers want to turn our industry adversarial, like theirs.

  2. My concern is that the small brokerages will not be able to provide the best options for their buyers. They won’t know what’s on the market. You can be the best buyer’s agent in the world, but if the rest of the industry is keeping their listings “secret” your buyer is out of luck! Doesn’t anybody else see it this way? Do we really want the small companies to disappear? I guess we might as well let WalMart take over the housing market!

Load More Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular Articles

Latest Articles

loanDepot’s Frank Martell on building lifelong consumer relationships through technology 

In this week’s episode of the Power House podcast, HousingWire President Diego Sanchez sits down for a tantalizing conversation with Frank Martell, the president and CEO of loanDepot, to discuss the company’s profitability in the third quarter of 2024 and its Project North Star growth plan for 2025.

3d rendering of a row of luxury townhouses along a street

Log In

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account? Please